Trying out my Domke Wraps

In the interests of full disclosure I’ve not been sponsored to write this in any way; if the makers of Domke Wraps need to sponsor a blogger as minor as me then in fact I’d worry about them!

For Christmas, I got a couple of the 19” Domke Wraps. I never use a proper camera bag, generally I prefer a no frills messenger bag because it’s unobtrusive, compact and I can fit in stuff like a book, my glasses, cake, etc. Just out of interest have you ever noticed how the makers of camera bags never consider that maybe you need to carry stuff other than camera equipment? Back in the late 70s I had a brilliant waist belt camera bag made, if I remember, by [Cullman](https://www.cullmann.de/en/home.html) which not only took my camera and a couple of lenses but also a few chocolate bars, a can of cola and a paperback; that being the age when I could drop a million calories a day safely and didn’t need glasses. I never saw another one; my local camera shop had this on special offer because they’d been sent it as a distributor sample but it hadn’t actually ever been launched as a dealer item. Generally though I find camera bags wonderfully lacking in usefulness for the average snapper who needs to put a camera in a bag and go out for the day. Every time I hunted for some solution I kept coming up against these things called Domke Wraps, which are a somewhat padded sheet you can wrap around stuff and secure with velcro. Well, I thought, what the hell, I’ll put a couple on my Christmas list.

Well today was the first time I got to try them out in anger. I wanted to go out with my Mamiya 645 shooting this morning and take a couple of extra lenses with me. Now the Mamiya is way too chunky for my messenger bag, and it’s not something I take out for casual snapping, so I’ve got a small rucksack for it. It goes into a sort of padded squidgy box thing from eBay, but I’ve never really had a solution for the lenses…until now! Made the wraps into pouches, stuffed the lenses into them and put them in the bottom compartment of the rucksack. Job done! I was so impressed with just how easy a solution this was and felt confident the lenses were going to be protected enough in there. The big win I think is that next time I want to take one of my digital cameras out for the day I can reconfigure a wrap and use it to protect that in my messenger bag. Got to admit, I’m a convert!

So if you’re looking for an easy solution to carrying your camera stuff in a bag which can also hold a paperback, your glasses, possibly a re-usable coffee cup should you find yourself heading towards a coffee outlet (these days we’ve moved on from cans of cola), and which doesn’t scream ‘camera bag, steal me’ then I’d say they’re worth a punt, especially as in the grand scheme of things they’re not that pricy. Mine, I suspect, came from [WEX](https://www.wexphotovideo.com/domke-f-34l-19-inch-protective-wrap-blue-1647996/), but they’re readily available from other places.

Dipping a toe into medium format

I’ve spent the last year or so trying to not express an interest in buying a Mamiya 645 a friend of mine wasn’t using. Eventually I bowed to the inevitable and asked if I could borrow it for a while to find out if I liked it. Not only do people still rave about the image quality to be had from the old medium format film cameras, but also let’s face it the 645 was the type of camera I could never have afforded back in the 70s and 80s, so the chance to own one now is pretty damn attractive.

The thing is a beast. The concept of medium is, once you think about it, based around the idea that it’s going to be midway between 35mm and 10″ by 8″, and that’s pretty massive when all is said and done. The lenses are huge (yes, it has a range of lenses) and hand holding it one realises early on requires a steady hand. Automation comes down to a light meter, none of this auto-focus malarky. I spent a fun afternoon putting new batteries in and and reading the manual to work out how to load the 120 roll of HP5 I’d decided would make a good test roll of film (another roll of HP5 and a Portrait 400 are in the fridge). It’s been ages since I had to read the manual to learn how to do something basic on a camera, the entire thing was a voyage into the unknown and was great fun.

So I shot off the roll of film around the garden, using either the onboard light meter, the one on my phone or my Sekonic hand held meter, so I could see how accurate the onboard one was. I realised early on that it needed good light to get the shutter speeds up enough for confident hand holding; the tripod adapter being large enough to dry dock a ship I decided it would be something for another day. So once I’d got to frame 15 it was back to the manual to unload it and off to A.G. Photolab (who are my processors of choice) for developing and scanning.

The image quality is stunning. It’s everything you love about film (I’m assuming that you do love film? everybody loves film! it’s like vinyl for your eyes..). It has the feel of 35mm with crispness and detail. But, people say the depth of field on medium format is small at large apertures, yes it is, it really really really is. No place for sloppy focussing with this puppy I can tell you.

Take a look at this one of our new patio and you’ll see what I mean.

02260014

 

That’s f/11 at a 250th focussed on the seat. On my cropped frame 450d at f/11 I can pretty much get sharp from here to Timbuktu. In this the fountain is blurred, but just look at how crisp the leaves on the maple are.

And at f3.5 this sunflower photo redefines bokeh

02260008

So the medium format experiment will continue, I’ll be loading up the next roll of HP5 and, equipped with my discoveries from this first roll, I’ll be attempting to make some images I’m pleased with. I think I’ll be breaking out that tripod adapter though.